The High Court disposed of the petition for regular bail as having become infructuous because the petitioners had already been acquitted by the trial court.
Petition disposed of as infructuous on account of prior acquittal of petitioners.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-36745 of 2011 Date of decision : 27.01.2012
Satpal and another
...Petitioners
Versus
State of Haryana
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present: Mr. Chirag Wadhwa, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Kartar Singh, D.A.G., Haryana for the respondent.
M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral)
At the very outset, learned State counsel has submitted that since the petitioners have already been acquitted by the trial Court, so, the instant petition for regular bail becomes infructuous, which may be disposed of as such.
This factual position has been acknowledged by learned counsel for the petitioners.
In this view of the matter, the instant petition is disposed of, as
having become infructuous.
January 27, 2012 naresh.k
( M ehinder S ingh S ullar ) Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petition for regular bail survives after the acquittal of the petitioners.
Satpal and another
State of Haryana
Mehinder Singh Suldar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
