The High Court allowed the withdrawal of a criminal miscellaneous petition to facilitate the petitioner's pursuit of alternative legal remedies.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh.
Crl.Misc.No.M- 2524 of 2012 (O&M). Date of Decision:- 07.09.2012.
Surinder Singh
Petitioner.
Versus
Kulwant Singh and others
Respondents.
CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI.
Present: - Mr.Raj Pal Kansal, Advocate,
for the petitioner.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI,J.
At the very out set, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition to enable the petitioner to take recourse to the alternative remedies available to him under law.
Allowed as prayed for.
Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE
07.09.2012 Anoop
Surinder Singh
Kulwant Singh and others
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
