Thin order dismissing a writ petition as withdrawn by the petitioner on the production of documents by the complainant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M No. 19146 of 2012
Date of Decision: November 26, 2012
Pargat Singh and another
…Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab
…Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr. L.M. Gulati, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Ms. Rarsimrat Rai, DAG, Punjab, for respondent.
Mr. Vaibhav Narang, Advocate, for the complainant.
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI, J.
In view of the documents (Annexures R-2/1 & R-2/2), produced on record by the complainant, learned counsel for the petitioners prays for withdrawal of the present petition at this stage.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
(NARESH KUMAR SANGHI) JUDGE
November 26, 2012 Pkapoor
Pargat Singh
State of Punjab
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
