The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of a criminal miscellaneous petition as not pressed, though the investigation was directed to continue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Criminal Misc. No.M-19865 of 2010 Date of Decision: 23rd November, 2012
Moman Ram
...Petitioner
Vs.
State of Punjab & Ors.
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
Present: Mr.S.P.Tinna, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.Rupam Aggarwal, Addl.Advocate General, Punjab.
Naresh Kumar Sanghi, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the status report dated 10.09.2012 filed by the Senior Superintendent of Police, Fazilka, the petitioner does not press this petition at this stage.
Disposed of as not pressed.
However, the Investigating Agency is directed to continue with the investigation and decide the issue at the earliest.
23rd November, 2012 seema
(Naresh Kumar Sanghi) Judge
Moman Ram
State of Punjab
NARESH KUMAR SANGHI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
