This order dismissed a criminal miscellaneous petition as infructuous after the underlying appeal was decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-19011 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 17.07.2012.
Arvind Verma
..Petitioner
Versus
Swati Verma
..Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present: Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Sartej Narula, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Kulwant Singh, Advocate, for the respondent.
Daya Chaudhary, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as counsel for
the respondent submit that the present petition has become
infructuous as the appeal has been decided.
Dismissed as infructuous.
(DAYA CHAUDHARY) JUDGE
17.07.2012 neetu
Arvind Verma
Swati Verma
Daya Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
