Petitioner claimed bail was granted under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C., rendering the petition infructuous. Court dismissed the petition as infructuous.
Petition dismissed as having become infructuous as bail was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No.M-16800 of 2012(O&M)
Date of Decision:22.08.2012
Bhajan Singh
... Petitioner
vs.
State of Punjab ... Respondent
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJENDER SINGH MALIK
Present:Mr. O.P. Kamboj, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Guninder Singh, AAG Punjab.
VIJENDER SINGH MALIK,J(ORAL)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition has become infructuous as bail has been granted to the petitioner under the provisions of section 167(2) Cr.P.C.
The petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
August 22,2012 ( VIJENDER SINGH MALIK ) Jiten JUDGE
Bhajan Singh
State of Punjab
Vijender Singh Malik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
