Dismissed
Raj Hooda v. State of Haryana
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/11519/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-11519 of 2012 Date of decision: 22.08.2012
Smt. Raj Hooda
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana
....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PARAMJEET SINGH
Present: - Mr. Saurabh Dalal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sidharth Sarup, DAG, Haryana. Mr. S.N. Pillania, Advocate, for the complainant.
PARAMJEET SINGH, J. (ORAL)
This is a petition filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner in case FIR No.143 dated 14.3.2012 under Sections 498A/406/323/506 IPC, registered at Police Station Hansi City, District Hissar.
Learned State counsel, after seeking instructions from ASI Katar Singh, states that the petitioner is not cooperating in the investigation nor disclosing the particulars of her son, who is residing abroad. He further states that as per the information of the Investigating Officer, he is stated to be residing in Singapore or somewhere else.
Keeping in view the above, no ground for concession of regular bail is made out.
Dismissed.
(Paramjeet Singh) Judge
August 22, 2012 R.S.
Smt. Raj Hooda
State of Haryana
Paramjeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court