This case was disposed of after the Court was informed via notice that the petitioner's daughter had been recovered and proceedings initiated. No substantive legal order was passed. The judgment contains no operative finding on any issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Date of Decision: August 22, 2012 CRM No. M-14555 of 2012 (O&M)
Lakhan Paswan
…petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
…Respondents
CORAM: HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present: Mr. Rahul Rampal, Advocate for the petitioner.
Ms. Gagan Mohini, AAG, Punjab
RITU BAHRI, J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the respondents, on instructions from
ASI Karan Pal has informed the Court that the petitioner's daughter Poonam Rani has since been recovered from U.P. and PO proceedings have been initiated against Shivram.
Accordingly, no further orders are required to be passed in
the matter.
Disposed of.
(RITU BAHRI) JUDGE August 22, 2012 Atul
Lakhan Paswan
State of Punjab
Ritu Bahri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
