This order under Section 482 Cr.P.C. disposed of a habeas corpus petition. The High Court directed Respondent No. 2 to look into petitioners' grievances and take appropriate measures if necessary.
Direction to Respondent No. 2 to look into petitioners' grievances and take appropriate measures if necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. M. No.M-13202 of 2012 Date of Decision:7.5.2012
Ankita Runani Saggar and another
.... Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
.... Respondents
CORAM: Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
Present: Mr. G.S. Latheri, Advocate for the petitioners.
1.Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2.To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3.Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
NIRMALJIT KAUR, J.(Oral)
This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners and also directing respondent No.4 not to interfere in the personal lives of the petitioners.
The petitioners along with their counsel are present in the
Court.
Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to look into the grievances of the petitioners and if found necessary, take appropriate measures in accordance with law.
7.5.2012 ( NIRMALJIT KAUR ) rajeev JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether directive was necessary to protect the lives and liberty of the petitioners?
Ankita Runani Saggar
another
State of Punjab
others
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
