O.P. Katyal v. A.M. Saran
Case brief
What is this about?
PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** COCP…
PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** COCP…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.244 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision: 06.03.2012
OP Katyal
. . . . Petitioner
VS.
AM Saran, IAS, FC & PS, Finance Deptt. Haryana . . . . Respondent
CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present: Mr. DR Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. Ravi Dutt Sharma, DAG Haryana
SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL)
(1). The respondent has filed his reply/affidavit dated 28.02.2012 along with a speaking order dated 26.05.2011 (Annexure R-1) rejecting the petitioner’s claim, leaving no cause to continue with these proceedings which are accordingly dropped and the petition is disposed of, however, with liberty to the petitioner to impugn the order (Annexure R1) before an appropriate forum, if so advised
(2). Dasti
06.03.2012
vishal shonkar
(SURYA KANT) Judge
OP Katyal
AM Saran, IAS, FC & PS, Finance Deptt. Haryana
SURYA KANT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court