The petition was disposed of as the respondent stated the legal notice matter had been decided via a speaking order dated 10.02.2012, leaving no cause to continue proceedings, with liberty to the petitioner to appeal.
Proceedings dropped; liberty granted to petitioner to impugns the order of 10.02.2012 before an appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.243 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision: 06.03.2012
Sanjay & Ors.
VS.
Pankaj Aggarwal, IAS, DC, Sonepat . . . . Respondent
CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present: Mr. RS Malik, Advocate for the petitioners
Mr. Ravi Dutt Sharma, DAG Haryana
SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL)
(1). The respondent has filed his reply/affidavit dated 29.02.2012 wherein it is averred that the legal notice submitted by the petitioner(s) has been decided vide speaking order dated 10.02.2012 (Annexure R-1/T), leaving no cause to continue with these proceedings which are accordingly dropped and the petition is disposed of, however, with liberty to the petitioner(s) to impugn the order (Annexure R-1/T)) before an appropriate forum, if so advised
(2). Dasti .
06.03.2012
vishal shonkar
(SURYA KANT) Judge
Sanjay & Ors.
Pankaj Aggarwal, IAS, DC, Sonepat
Surya Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
