Reference order transferring COCP No.2327 of 2011 to COCP No.2325 of 2011 for hearing in the High Court of Punjab and Haryana.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.2327 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 24.02.2012
Mahipal & Ors.
vs.
Vijeyander Kumar, Director, School Education, Haryana Panchkula & Anr. . . . . Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present: Mr. Deepak Sonak, Advocate for the petitioner(s)
Mr. Ravi Dutt Sharma, DAG Haryana
SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL)
For orders, see COCP No.2325 of 2011 titled as Kelo vs.
Vijeyander Kumar, Director, School Education, Haryana
Panchkula & Anr. of even date.
24.02.2012
vishal shonkar
(SURYA KANT) Judge
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
COCP No.2325 of 2011Referred¶19
Mahipal
Vijeyander Kumar
Surya Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
