Amar Singh v. S.N. Singla
Case brief
What is this about?
PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** COCP…
PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH **** COCP…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.1152 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 24.02.2012
Amar Singh
vs.
SN Singla, Executive Engineer, Provisional Division PWD B&R Branch, Narnaul
CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present: Dr. SK Redhu , Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. Ravi Dutt Sharma, DAG Haryana
SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL)
(1). The respondents have filed the reply/affidavit along with details of payments made to the petitioner leaving no cause to continue with the present proceedings which are accordingly dropped and the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner that in case there is any other pending claim, he may submit a representation in regard thereto, before the Authorities who shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with Rules/law.
(2). Rule discharged. Dasti .
24.02.2012
vishal shonkar
(SURYA KANT) Judge
Amar Singh
SN Singla
Surya Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court