The High Court disposed of consolidation petitions alleging non-compliance of directions for service regularization. Relying on a regularizing order by the State, the proceedings were dropped with a direction to release consequential benefits within four months.
Proceedings dropped; direction to release consequential benefits within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.2325 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 24.02.2012
Kelo
vs.
Vijeyander Kumar, Director, School Education, Haryana Panchkula & Anr. . . . . Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present: Mr. Deepak Sonak, Advocate for the petitioner(s)
Mr. Ravi Dutt Sharma, DAG Haryana
SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL)
(1). This order shall dispose of COCP Nos.2325, 2326 & 2327 of 2011 which allege non-compliance of the directions issued by this Court for consideration of the petitioners’ claim for regularization of their services.
(3). Rules discharged. Dasti .
24.02.2012
vishal shonkar
(SURYA KANT)
Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court should grant consequential benefits to petitioners after regularization of services.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kelo
Vijeyander Kumar
SURYA KANT
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
