The petitioners challenged their joining date assignment from August 2004. The respondent filed an affidavit clarifying the date, removing the cause for litigation. The court discharged the rule and dropped the proceedings.
Proceedings dropped; rule discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.1679 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 23.02.2012
Chand Kumar Sangwan & Ors.
VS.
Arun Kumar, IAS, MD, UHBVNL . . . . Respondent
CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present: Mr. Anurag Goyal, Advocate for the petitioners
Mr. Mohnish Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Narender Hooda, Advocate for the respondent
SURYA KANT, J. (ORAL)
(1). The respondents have filed an affidavit along with an order dated 22.02.2012 (Annexure R1) whereby the petitioners have been assigned their due date of joining from August, 2004, leaving no cause to continue with these proceedings which are accordingly dropped and the petition is disposed of.
(2). Rule discharged. Dasti .
23.02.2012
vishal shonkar
(SURYA KANT) Judge
2 issues framed by the court
Whether proceedings regarding the petitioner's assigned joining date should continue.
Whether the petition should be disposed of after the respondent clarifies the due date.
Chand Kumar Sangwan & Ors.
Arun Kumar
Surya Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
