The High Court granted liberty to the petitioner to challenge an order dated 16.03.2009 which disposed of his proceedings, noting that a copy was only handed over on the date of this order.
Liberty granted to impugn the order dated 16.03.2009.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.1784 of 2011 (O&M) Date of Decision: 27.02.2012 ****
Daya Ram
vs.
Nitin Yadav, Administrator, HUDA, Gurgaon & Anr. . . . . Respondents
CORAM : HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT
1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporters or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
Present: Mr. RA Yadav, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. Siddharth Batra, Advocate for the respondents *****
SURYA KANT J. (ORAL)
27.02.2012 vishal shonkar
(SURYA KANT) Judge
Daya Ram
Nitin Yadav
Surya Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
