The Court disposed of an contempt petition noting compliance with directions via a speaking order by the second respondent, dropping proceedings and granting liberty to approach an appropriate forum if dissatisfied.
contempt proceedings dropped with liberty to challenge the impugned order before an appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.O.C.P.No.1141 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision : May 09, 2012
Sukhmander Singh and others versus Sh.Hussan Lal and another
.....Petitioners
.....Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.
Present : Mr.Vivek Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.G.S.Cheema, Senior DAG, Punjab.
-.-
Surya Kant, J. (Oral)
In compliance to the directions issued by this Court, the second respondent has passed a speaking order dated 16/26.4.2012, a copy of which is taken on record, leaving no cause to continue with these contempt proceedings which are accordingly dropped.
The contempt petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioners that in case they are dis-satisfied with the impugned order, they may challenge the same before an appropriate forum.
Dasti.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sukhmander Singh and others
Sh.Hussan Lal and another
Surya Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
