This order dismisses a reference note in a single line, directing that detailed reasons be found in a separate order passed on the same day for R.F.A. No. 2873 of 2002.
Order passed by reference to a separate detailed order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
R.F.A. NO. 2984 OF 2002 (O & M) (L.A.C. NO. 99 OF 2001)
Balbir Singh and others
.........Appellants
Versus
State of Haryana and others
...........Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present : Mr. A. K. Singal, Advocate for the appellants
Mr. Ashish Gupta, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana
RAJESH BINDAL, J.
For orders, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order passed today in R.F.A. No. 2873 of 2002, titled as Roop Chand and others Versus State of Haryana and others.
26.5.2011
aj
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Roop Chand and others Versus State of Haryana and othersReferred¶12
R.F.A. No. 2873 of 2002, Roop Chand and others Versus State of Haryana and others
Balbir Singh and others
State of Haryana and others
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
