The court disposed of RFA No. 136 of 2004 by referring the matters to a separate detailed order passed on the same day in a connected revision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
R.F.A. NO. 136 OF 2004 (O & M) (L.A.C. NO. 184 OF 2001/2002)
Mohar Singh and others
.........Appellants
Versus
State of Haryana and another
...........Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present : Mr. Sunil Panwar, Advocate
for the appellants
Mr. Ashish Gupta, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana
RAJESH BINDAL, J.
For orders, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order passed today in R.F.A. No. 2873 of 2002, titled as Roop Chand and others Versus State of Haryana and others.
26.5.2011
aj
(RAJESH BINDAL) JUDGE
Mohar Singh
State of Haryana
Rajesh Bindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
