State of Haryana v. Tansukh
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court declared that orders regarding R.F.A. No. 276 of 2009 (Mohinder Singh) are recorded in a separate order, deeming this brief order as a procedural pointer.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
R.F.A. No. 1001 of 2010 (O & M) (LAC NO. 254 of 2006/2009)
State of Haryana and another
.....Appellants
Versus
Tansukh
.....Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH BINDAL
Present: Mr. H.S. Hooda, Advocate General assisted by Mr. Ashish Gupta, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana.
None for the landowner.
RAJESH BINDAL J.
For orders, see detailed reasons recorded in a separate order passed today in R.F.A. No. 276 of 2009, titled as Mohinder Singh and others Versus State of Haryana and others.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
State of Haryana and another
- respondent
Tansukh
Coram
Rajesh Bindal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · February
- Registered
- Case no.
- RFA/1001/2010
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court