The petitioner failed to appear for hearing despite the case being called twice. This Court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution, expressing that the petitioners were not interested in pursuing the matter.
The writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.18365 of 1991 Date of decision : 11.2.2011
Mrs.Surjit Kaur and others .........Petitioners Vs. State of Haryana and others ........Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present : Nemo for the petitioners
Ms.Kirti Singh, DAG, Haryana for the respondents
Mehinder Singh Sullar, J (Oral)
This writ petition was filed in this Court on 10.12.1991 and was admitted on 12.12.1991. The bare perusal of the record would reveal that none had appeared on behalf of the petitioners on 7.2.2011 when this petition came up for hearing. Consequently, the case was adjourned to 11.2.2011, for arguments.
11th Feb., 2011 akm
( M ehinder S ingh S ullar) Judge
Mrs. Surjit Kaur and others
State of Haryana and others
Mehinder Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
