In a writ petition under Article 226, the single judge dismissed the application for non-prosecution as the petitioner appeared neither in person nor through counsel on two consecutive hearing dates.
The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH *****
CWP No.14518 of 1991 Date of decision : 11.2.2011
Dharamvir Singh Ghelwat ..........Petitioner Vs. State of Haryana and another ........Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present : Nemo for the petitioner
Ms.Kirti Singh, DAG, Haryana for the respondents
Mehinder Singh Sullar, J (Oral)
This writ petition was filed in this Court on 19.9.1991 and was admitted on 20.9.1991. The bare perusal of the record would reveal that none had appeared on behalf of the petitioner on 7.2.2011 when this petition came up for hearing. Consequently, the case was adjourned to 11.2.2011, for arguments.
11th Feb., 2011 akm
( M ehinder S ingh S ullar) Judge
Dharamvir Singh Ghelwat
State of Haryana
Mehinder Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
