Writ petition for quashing charge-sheet dismissed as infructuous because the enquiry against the petitioner had already been completed.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.1122 of 1992 Date of decision : 10.2.2011
Raj Kumar
..........Petitioner
Vs.
State of Punjab and others .......Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR :
Present : Mr.Harpal Singh, Advocate, for Mr.Nawab Singh, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr.R.S.Rawat, AAG, Punjab for the respondents
Mehinder Singh Sullar, J (Oral )
The petitioner, in the instant writ petition, has sought the quashment of impugned charge-sheet dated 29.6.1989 (Annexure P-2) on the ground of delay and latches.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondents submitted that, since the impugned enquiry has already been completed against the petitioner, so the writ petition has become infructuous.
This factual matrix has been acknowledged by learned counsel for the petitioner.
In this view of the matter, the writ petition is hereby dismissed as having become infructuous.
( M ehinder S ingh S ullar) Judge 10th Feb., 2011 akm
Raj Kumar
State of Punjab
Mehinder Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
