Single-line order dismissing a writ petition as infructuous on acknowledgment that the factual enquiry against the petitioner had already been completed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No.168 of 1992 Date of decision : 10.2.2011
Manjit Singh
..........Petitioner
Vs.
State of Punjab and another .......Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR :
Present : Mr.Anurag Chopra, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr.R.S.Rawat, AAG, Punjab for the respondents
Mehinder Singh Sullar, J (Oral )
The petitioner, in the instant writ petition, has sought the quashment of impugned charge-sheet dated 29.6.1989 (Annexure P-2) on the ground of delay and latches.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondents submitted that, since the impugned enquiry has already been completed against the petitioner, so the writ petition has become infructuous.
This factual matrix has been acknowledged by learned counsel for the petitioner.
In this view of the matter, the writ petition is hereby dismissed as
having become infructuous.
( M ehinder S ingh S ullar) Judge
10th Feb., 2011 akm
Manjit Singh
State of Punjab
Mehender Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
