Parkasho Devi v. State of Punjab and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
The learned single judge in a writ petition allowed the petitioner to withdraw the petition. The matter was dismissed as withdrawn.
The learned single judge in a writ petition allowed the petitioner to withdraw the petition. The matter was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P. No.17217 of 2011
Date of Decision:-3.11.2011
Parkasho Devi
...Petitioner
Versus
The State of Punjab & Ors. ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present:Mr.Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mehinder Singh Sullar, J . (Oral)
At the very outset, the learned counsel for petitioner intends to
withdraw the instant writ petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn as prayed for.
(Mehinder Singh Sullar) 3.11.2011 Judge AS
Parkasho Devi
The State of Punjab
Mehinder Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court