This oral order dismisses a writ petition due to the petitioner's non-prosecution and repeated absence without counsel upon hearing on October 20, 2011, and November 3, 2011.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
C.W.P. No. 10825 of 1993 Date of decision : 03.11.2011
Haryana State Minor Irrigation and T/Well Corpration Ltd.
...Petitioner
versus
The Presiding Officer and others
..Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR
Present: Nemo for the petitioner.
Nemo for respondent No.1.
Mr. Ramesh Goyat, Advocate for respondent No. 2.
M ehinder S ingh S ullar, J. (Oral)
The bare perusal of the record would reveal that nemo had appeared on behalf of the petitioner on October 20, 2011, when this writ came up for hearing. Consequently, the petition was adjourned for arguments.
Today again no one is present on its behalf despite the case having been repeatedly called.
From the sequence of events narrated here-in-above, it appears that neither the petitioner nor its counsel is interested in pursuing the petition. Therefore, no option is left with this Court except to dismiss the petition for nonprosecution.
Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
November 03, 2011 ( M ehinder S ingh S ullar ) naresh.k Judge
Haryana State Minor Irrigation and T/Well Corpration Ltd.
The Presiding Officer and others
Mehinder Singh Sullar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
