In this case, FIR No. 271 dated 27.11.2003 was registered under Sections 363,366-A, 376 IPC at Police Station Moga. After investigation of the case, as the petitioner was found innocent, she was kept in column No.2 and report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. was presented. Subsequently, respondent No.2 filed a private complaint before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Moga on 14.9.2005 on the same allegations as levelled in the FIR, in which, the petitioner was summoned vide order dated 25.1.2006. Both FIR as well as complaint cases were consolidated and charges were framed under Sections 363,366,376,120-B IPC against mother in law and husband. Since the petitioner was staying in Canada, P.O. proceedings were initiated against her in her absence and after expiry of 30 days, she was declared P.O. vide order dated 5.7.2006. The trial was conducted by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Moga and accusedSukhwinder Pal Singh (husband) and Phino Kaur (mother-in-lw) were acquitted vide judgment dated 18.10.2008. The evidence against the present petitioner is also the same. It has also come in the said judgment that complainant-respondent No.2 had eloped with accused-Sukhwinder Pal Singh and solemnized marriage, which was contrary to the wishes of her parents. As per statement of complainant-respondent No.2 before the Magistrate, it was denied by her that she was ever kidnapped or taken away against her will and she stayed with Sukhwinder Pal Singh as his wife. After arrest of Sukhwinder Pal Singh, complainant was sent to Nari Niketan and after recording her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C., she opted to accompany her parents and her custody was handed over to her parents. After that due to pressure of the parents, the aforesaid complaint
