Balraj Singh v. State of Punjab and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petition dismissed as infructuous because investigation was complete, some accused died or fled, warrants and proclamations were issued, no further directions required.
Petition dismissed as infructuous because investigation was complete, some accused died or fled, warrants and proclamations were issued, no further directions required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
Crl. Misc. No. M-21339 of 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-21339 of 2010
DATE OF DECISION: 22.03.2011
Balraj Singh Deol
..........Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab and others
..........Respondents
BEFORE:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY
Present:Mrs. G.K. Mann, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Gaurav Garg Dhuriwala, AAG, Punjab.
DAYA CHAUDHARY, J.
Investigation report by way of short affidavit of Jaswant Singh, S.I., Economic Offences Wing Jalandhar City has been filed in Court today and the same is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the respondent-State on the basis of investigation report submits that a written complaint was made by the petitioner and FIR No. 34 dated 23.1.2009 under Sections 420,468,471,511,120-B IPC was registered at Police Station Division No.4, Jalandhar against Satvir Kaur, Gurmeet Kaur, Bahadur Singh and Pritam Singh. The investigation of the case was conducted by Inspector Kulwant Singh, Economic Offences Wing, Jalandhar and after completion of the investigation, final report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. was prepared and was presented before the Court on 29.7.2010 against accused Resham Singh, Gurmeet Kaur and Jagtar Singh. Learned counsel for respondent-State
(2)
Crl. Misc. No. M-21339 of 2010
further submits that accused-Dara Singh had died and subsequently accused Rakesh Kumar was arrested on 2.9.2010 and now he is on bail. He also submits that in this case, inquiry was also conducted by Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police, Headquarter Jalandhar against the role of Satvir Kaur, Bahadur Singh and Pritam Singh, who found them guilty of the offences. Raids were conducted to arrest them but accused-Satvir Kaur and Bahadur Singh were found to be away to Canada and Pritam Singh knowingly escaped from his village. The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jalandhar had issued warrant of arrest for accused Satvir Kaur, Pritam Singh and Bahadur Singh for 17.2.2011 and on 17.2.2011 proclamation order of the accused has been issued for 26.3.2011.
In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the respondent-State, no further direction is required to be issued in this petition. The present petition has become infructuous and the same is dismissed as such.
March 22, 2011 pooja
(DAYA CHAUDHARY) JUDGE
Note:-Whether this case is to be referred to the Reporter .......Yes/No
Balraj Singh Deol
State of Punjab
Daya Chaudhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court