Raj Pal v. State of Haryana
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought anticipatory bail under Sections 7, 10, and 85 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955. Court made interim order absolute after respondent stated petitioner joined investigation and was not needed for custodial interrogation. Petition disposed.
What did the court decide?
Interim order granting anticipatory bail made absolute; petition disposed of.
What the court decided
Crl. Misc No. M 17622 OF 2011
Raj Pal vs State of Haryana
Present : Mr. Rajat Mor Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Manmohan Sikka, DAG Haryana
The petitioner seeks grant of anticipatory bail in case FIR No.119, dated 28.3.2011, registered under Sections 7/10/85 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, at Police Station Sadar Panipat.
Counsel for the respondent, on instructions from ASI Balwan Singh, has stated that the petitioner has joined the investigation and is no more required for any custodial interrogation.
In the circumstances, the interim order dated 8.6.2011 is made absolute. Petition stands disposed of.
( AJAY TEWARI )
August 04, 2011. JUDGE `kk'
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Raj Pal
- respondent
State of Haryana
Coram
AJAY TEWARI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRM-M/17622/2011
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court