Gurbakshish Singh and Orws. Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Sunil Taneja, who is present in Court, has been filed. As per compromise (Annexure P-2), both the parties have settled the dispute amicably as per the conditions recorded in the compromise. Counsel

¶22

2

¶23

Criminal Misc. No. M-13709 OF 2010 (O&M)

¶24

for the respondent does not dispute the genuineness of the compromise (Annexure P-2) annexed with the petition.

¶25

In view of the affidavit of respondent No. 2-Sunil Taneja (Annexure P-3), FIR No. 301, dated 25.11.2009, under Sections 406, 420, 120B IPC, registered at Police Station Sadar, Jalandhar, is quashed with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom qua petitioners in view of law laid down in Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab, 2007(3) RCR(Criminal) 1052.

¶26

The petition stands disposed of.

¶27

[RITU BAHRI] JUDGE

¶28

21^st January, 2011 Shivani Kaushik

Gurbakshish Singh and Orws. v. State of Punjab and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gurbakshish Singh and Orws. v. State of Punjab and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravi and Ors. Vs State of Haryana and Anr.

Jaswinder Singh Vs State of Punjab and Anr.

Bhachattiar Singh and Ors. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Richa Sareen Vs Manjt Kaur

Kanta Arora and Anr. Vs State of Punjab and Ors.

Pardeep Kaur & Anr. Vs State of Punjab & Ors.