Dismissed
Neha Khetarpal v. Ut of Chandigarh & Anr.
Punjab & Haryana HCCRM-M/1297/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
What the court decided
AI extract
COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-1297 of 2011 Date of decision:-17.1.2011
Neha Khetarpal
...Petitioner
Versus
Union Territory, Chandigarh and another
...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI
Present:Mr. I.P.S. Kohli, Advocate for the petitioner.
RITU BAHRI J.(Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing for some time makes a prayer that he may be allowed to withdraw this petition to enable him to take all these pleas before the trial Court.
Prayer allowed.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
However, personal appearance of the petitioner before the trial Court is exempted subject to the following conditions:- (i) petitioner shall be represented through counsel; (ii) shall not delay/stall the trial proceedings; (iii) shall not dispute his identity as an accused: (iv) shall have no objection if the prosecution evidence is recorded in his absence but in the presence of his counsel; (v) shall appear before the trial Court as and when required by the trial Court; and (vi) any other condition which the learned trial Court may impose.
Neha Khetarpal
Union Territory, Chandigarh
Another
Ritu Bahri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court