Munshi Ram v. State of Punjab
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge reduced the sentence of the appellant from three months' rigorous imprisonment to one-and-a-half months, considering age, non-commercial quantity of poppy husk, and time already served as mitigating factors.
What did the court decide?
Sentence reduced from three months rigorous imprisonment to one-and-a-half months rigorous imprisonment; appeal disposed of.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Criminal Appeal No. 3284-SB of 2011
1
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh
Criminal Appeal No. 3284-SB of 2011
Date of Decision: 15.12.2011
Munshi Ram
... Appellant
Versus
The State of Punjab
... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KANWALJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA.
Present: Mr. D.R. Singla, Advocate for the appellant.
Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia, J. (Oral)
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant, who had undergone a part of the sentence, was entitled to a reduction in the sentence based on age, quantity of narcotic recovered, and time served.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Munshi Ram
- respondent
The State of Punjab
Coram
Kanwaljit Singh Ahluwalia
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Punjab & Haryana HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRA-S/3284/2011
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court