I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the available record from which I have found that the concern shown by the petitioner in respect of not recording the exact proceedings in the zimni orders is not illfounded. This Court has experienced that the Courts below are not sensitive towards the recording of zimni orders which has a great sanctity in the judicial proceedings. From the zimni orders, it can be ascertained as to what has transpired before the Court on a particular date. In the present case, the zimni orders have been recorded by the learned Rent Controller in a casual manner. Even though Shri S.K.Sharma, Rent Controller, Chandigarh has alleged that he has only recorded two orders dated 12.10.2010 and 04.12.2010 and has alleged that he has been dictating it in accordance with the proceedings which takes place in the Court, yet I am of the view that even these two orders did not depict the correct position. For example, it is not clear on whose request the case was adjourned by the Court. The litigation is increasing day by day and the higher Courts are being unnecessarily burdened only because of the petty errors committed by the subordinate Courts. Had the zimni orders been correctly recorded by the Rent Controller, the petitioner would not have a cause to come to this Court for seeking a direction, which is otherwise a solemn duty of the Court.
