The single-judge High Court allowed a civil miscellaneous application and dismissed the accompanying civil revision petition as infructuous because the plaintiff-respondent had withdrawn the underlying suit.
Civil miscellaneous application allowed; Civil Revision Petition No.1576 of 2011 dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CM No. 7637-CII of 2011 in/and Civil Revision No. 1576 of 2011
Date of decision: March 21, 2011
Subhash Mittal
.. Petitioner
Vs.
Charan Dass and others
.. Respondents
Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice A.N. Jindal
Present: Mr. Arun Jain, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rajinder Goyal, Advocate for the petitioner- non applicant. Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate for the applicant- respondents No.1 and 2.
A.N. Jindal, J (Oral)
Heard.
Contended that since the plaintiff- respondent has withdrawn the suit, therefore, this petition has become infructuous.
Consequently, the instant civil miscellaneous application is allowed and the civil revision petition No.1576 of 2011, stands dismissed being infructuous.
March 21, 2011 (A.N. Jindal) deepak Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a petition becomes infructuous due to withdrawal of the underlying suit.
Subhash Mittal
Charan Dass
A.N. Jindal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
