The court allowed a miscellaneous application to fix the hearing date for the main case. Simultaneously, it dismissed a revision petition as withdrawn with liberty to raise all pleas before the trial Court.
Crl. Misc. Application allowed; case fixed for hearing. Crl. Rev. dismissed as withdrawn with liberty.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No.14322 of 2011 and
Crl. Rev. No.1162 of 2010 Date of Decision: 18.03.2011
Naresh Kumar Singla
....Petitioner
Versus
State of Haryana etc.
...Respondents
CORAM : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Nirmaljit Kaur
Present:Mr. Vikram Singh, Advocate for the applicant-petitioner.
**
NIRMALJIT KAUR, J. (ORAL)
Crl. Misc. No.14322 of 2011
This is an application under Section 482 Cr.P.C for fixing the
actual date in the above noted case.
Crl. Misc. Application is allowed and the main case is taken up for hearing today itself.
Crl. Rev. No.1162 of 2010
This is a revision petition against the order dated 17.11.2009 passed by the Special Judge, Gurgaon.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to raise all the pleas, as raised herein, before the trial Court.
Dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(NIRMALJIT KAUR) JUDGE
18.03.2011 gurpreet
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to fix the actual date of hearing for the main case or permit withdrawal of the revision petition.
Whether the revision petition may be withdrawn with liberty to raise pleas before the trial Court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Naresh Kumar Singla
State of Haryana
Nirmaljit Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
