Petitioners, teachers in government schools, sought recognition of services rendered in government aided private schools. The court allowed the petition, relying on a settlement established in a prior 1991 judgment by the same court.
The present writ petition is allowed in terms of the order dated 10.3.2010 passed in Sukhdev Singh's case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.9631 of 1995 Date of Decision : April 08, 2010.
Jai Parkash and others
..... Petitioners
versus
State of Punjab and others
..... Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA KANT.
Present : Ms.Alka Chatrath, Advocate, for the petitioners. Ms.Charu Tuli, Senior DAG, Punjab.
-.-
1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?
(Oral) Surya Kant, J.
The petitioners are working as Teachers/Masters/Mistresses in various Government Schools run by the Education Department, Government of Punjab. They seek a mandamus to direct the respondents to take into consideration the services rendered by them in the Government Aided Privately Managed Schools for the purposes of various service benefits.
During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the parties are ad-idem that the controversy involved in this case stands settled by a decision dated 10.3.2010 rendered by this Court in CWP No.14238 of
1991 (Sukhdev Singh and others versus State of Punjab and others).
C.W.P.No .9631 of 1995 2
The present writ petition is accordingly allowed in terms of the afore-stated order dated 10.3.2010 passed in Sukhdev Singh's case
(supra).
Dasti.
April 08, 2010 (SURYA KANT) Mohinder JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether services rendered in Government Aided Private Schools should be considered for service benefits.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sukhdev Singh and others versus State of Punjab and othersFollowed¶16
CWP No.14238 of 1991 (Sukhdev Singh and others versus State of Punjab and others)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jai Parkash and others
State of Punjab and others
Surya Kant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
