Mohinder Kumar v. State of Punjab and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil…
COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH Civil…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.16405 of 2009 Date of Decision: November 08, 2010
Mohinder Kumar
.....PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
State of Punjab & others
.....RESPONDENT(S)
. . .
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA
PRESENT: - Dr. M.L. Sachdeva, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Charu Tuli, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondents.
. . .
AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that all the retiral benefits have been received and therefore, cause of action does not survive.
The petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous on the statement of learned counsel for the petitioner.
(AJAI LAMBA) November 08, 2010 JUDGE avin
Mohinder Kumar
State of Punjab
AJAI LAMBA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court