Writ petition seeking mandamus for issuance of Family Pension dismissed as infructuous after a reply established the pension would be paid from the date of the husband's death.
Petition held infructuous due to orders confirming payment of pension; writ disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.14858 of 2010 Date of Decision: November 08, 2010
Rano Devi
.....PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
State of Punjab & others
.....RESPONDENT(S)
. . .
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA
PRESENT: - Mr. Rajesh K. Dadwal, Advocate, for the petitioner(s). Mr. B.S. Chahal, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.
. . .
AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral)
CWP No.14858 of 2010 [2]
(AJAI LAMBA)
November 08, 2010 JUDGE
avin
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to Family Pension directed to be paid by the respondents.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rano Devi
State of Punjab
AJAI LAMBA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
