The Court dismissed two civil writ petitions filed by education department employees contesting the rejection of their promotion claims as withdrawn.
Civil writ petitions dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh if any junior has been promoted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.14389 of 2010 Date of Decision: August 23, 2010
Santosh Rani & Another
.....PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
State of Punjab & Others
.....RESPONDENT(S)
. . .
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA
PRESENT: - Mr. Amrik Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners.
. . .
AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral)
CWP No.14389 of 2010 [2]
with the comments “not suitable for promotion”. Learned counsel contends that no reasons have been assigned for ignoring the claim of the petitioners for promotion.
in case any person junior to them has been promoted.
(AJAI LAMBA)
August 23, 2010 JUDGE avin
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the civil writ petitions for promotion and quashing of the rejection order are maintainable.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Santosh Rani & Another
State of Punjab & Others
AJAI LAMBA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
