Single judge allowed the petition as covered by a previous judgment quashing a State of Punjab circular, but subject to the outcome of a pending Supreme Court appeal.
Petition allowed in the same terms as CWP No. 15554 of 2007.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP No. 14893 of 2010
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CWP No. 14893 of 2010
DATE OF DECISION: August 20, 2010
Mohinder Singh and another
.........PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
State of Punjab and others
......RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA
Present: Mr. G.P. Vashisht, Advocate, for the petitioner(s).
AJAI LAMBA, J. (ORAL)
at this stage itself, in view of peculiar facts and circumstances of the case.
CWP No. 14893 of 2010
2
20.08.2010 shivani
(AJAI LAMBA) JUDGE
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant relief/benefits in terms of the earlier judgment in CWP No. 15554 of 2007
Whether the current petition is covered by the judgment in Gian Chand's case
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Gian Chand and others Vs. State of PunjabFollowed¶1
CWP No. 15554 of 2007 (Gian Chand and others Vs. State of Punjab) decided on 21.07.2008
Special Leave Petition No. 25856 of 2008Referred¶8
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohinder Singh and another
State of Punjab and others
Ajai Lamba
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
