Cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to an accused. The High Court held that since the challenged order referred to a portion of the accused's affidavit which was also included in the FIR, there was no factual error. The petition was dismissed.
Petition for cancellation of anticipatory bail dismissed. No relief granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH
Criminal Miscellaneous No. M-24067 of 2010 Date of Decision: August 23, 2010
Sundeep Diwan
.....PETITIONER(S)
VERSUS
State of Haryana & Another
.....RESPONDENT(S)
. . .
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAI LAMBA
PRESENT: - Mr. Ashish Aggarwal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
AJAI LAMBA, J (Oral)
Crl. Misc. No. M-24067 of 2010 [2]
(AJAI LAMBA)
August 23, 2010 JUDGE avin
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail granted to respondent No.2 should be cancelled based on the alleged inclusion of non-existing facts from an affidavit in the order.
Whether the inclusion of the affidavit portion in the FIR contained factual errors warranting cancellation of anticipatory bail.
Sundeep Diwan
State of Haryana
Rohit Kaushik
AJAI LAMBA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
