Writ petition by a Headmaster petitioner dismissed as premature. Petitioner claimed his case was under consideration for promotion, arguing a complaint about a communication was too early.
The writ petition is dismissed as pre-mature.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.14008 of 2010
Hari Dutt Sharma Vs. State of Haryana & another
Present: Mr.R.N.Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioner.
RANJIT SINGH, J.
Even as per own showing of the petitioner, his case is under consideration as his name was left over for promotion to the post of Headmaster. This communication has been received by the petitioner about a month ago. It is too early for him to make a grievance, since his case is under consideration.
The writ petition is dismissed as pre-mature.
August 09, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) ramesh JUDGE
Hari Dutt Sharma
State of Haryana
RANJIT SINGH
ramesh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
