The petition was rendered infructuous as the relief claimed was granted by another order; the writ petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No. 10985 of 2010 Date of decision: 06.08.2010
Dara Ravi Chandrabhan
...Petitioner
Versus
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh etc. ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH
Present: Mr. Surinder Batta, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Tarun Lehal, Advocate for Mr. Arun Palli, Senior Advocate for the respondents.
RANJIT SINGH J.
Counsel submits that the relief claimed in the writ petition
stands granted. The writ petition is, therefore, rendered infructuous.
Dismissed as such.
August 6, 2010 ( RANJIT SINGH ) rts JUDGE
Dara Ravi Chandrabhan
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh etc.
Ranjit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
