Prem Lata v. State of Haryana and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought interest on delayed medical reimbursement. Court held welfare schemes are gratuitous; delay in payment does not attract interest.
Petitioner sought interest on delayed medical reimbursement. Court held welfare schemes are gratuitous; delay in payment does not attract interest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Civil Writ Petition No.13970 of 2010
Prem Lata
Vs. The State of Haryana & others
Present: Mr.Vijay Kumar Jindal, Advocate, for the petitioner.
RANJIT SINGH, J.
The husband of the petitioner retired as a District Revenue Officer on 31.1.1990. In the year 2007, he was admitted in Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, Rajinder Nagar, New Delhi as he suffered a brain haemorrhage and heart attack. The late husband of the petitioner remained admitted in hospital from 8.1.2007 to 6.3.2007. The petitioner claims to have incurred expenses of 9,49,100/-. He was discharged from the hospital on 6.3.2007, but subsequently expired on 5.5.2007. The petitioner being his wife made a claim for reimbursement of 9,50,600/- and submitted the documents with complete formalities. Her grievance is that she was made to struggle for getting this money for over a period of two years. Finally, the medical reimbursement to the tune of ` 7,26,151/- was allowed on 4.5.2009. Still, the money was not paid as the budget was not available.
Concededly, now the petitioner has received this amount and she has now come up with the grievance that interest be allowed on this payment for delayed release thereof. Medical reimbursement is a welfare scheme which is for benefit of the employees and is more in the nature of gratuitous scheme. Delay of release of amount paid as welfare measure should not normally call for payment of interest.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed.
( RANJIT SINGH ) JUDGE
August 09, 2010 ramesh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether interest should be allowed on delayed payment of medical reimbursement under a welfare scheme?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Prem Lata
The State of Haryana
Ranit Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court