Petitioner sought to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous petition. The order was treated as a withdrawal of the petition and dismissed on that ground without discussion of merits or other legal propositions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Criminal Misc. No. M-34481 of 2010 Date of decision : 17.12.2010
Ramesh
....Petitioner
V/s
State of Haryana
....Respondent
BEFORE : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present : Mr. Randhir Shehrawat, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Goyal, AAG Haryana.
RAJAN GUPTA J. (ORAL)
After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that he may be allowed to withdraw this petition.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
December 17, 2010 (RAJAN GUPTA) Ajay JUDGE
Ramesh
State of Haryana
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
