Petition under Section 482 CrPC filed for directions to protect petitioners' life and liberty. Respondent No.4 opposed no objection regarding marriage. Court held no further interference was called for and disposed of petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M-19576 of 2010 (O&M) Date of Decision: August 26, 2010
Nitika Bhau and another
........Petitioners
Versus
State of Punjab and others
.......Respondents
CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present: Mr. Balkar Singh, Advocate, for the petitioners.
Mr. Amandeep Singh Rai, AAG, Punjab.
Mr. T.P.S. Tung, Advocate, for respondents No.4 & 5.
Respondent No.4 in person.
SABINA, J.
Petitioners have filed this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for issuance of directions to respondents No.2 and 3 to protect their life and liberty from the hands of respondents No.4 and 5.
Respondent No.4 is present in person and has submitted that he has no objection qua the marriage of the petitioners.
Hence, no further interference by this Court is called for.
Petition is disposed of accordingly.
August 26, 2010 Anand
(SABINA) JUDGE
1 issue framed by the court
Whether intervention is required under Section 482 CrPC to protect life and liberty given respondent's consent to marriage
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nitika Bhau
another
State of Punjab
others
Sabina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
