Vinod Verma v. State of Punjab
Case brief
What is this about?
M-17352 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE…
M-17352 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl. Misc. No. M-17352 of 2010 1
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No. M-17352 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 25.8.2010
Vinod Verma ...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. Y.P. Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Shailesh Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.
Rajan Gupta, J. (oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that present case has been rendered infructuous as the FIR in question has already been quashed.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
(RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE
25.8.2010 'rajpal'
Vinod Verma
State of Punjab
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court