Mohinder Singh & Anr. v. State of Punjab
Case brief
What is this about?
M-16680 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE…
M-16680 of 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Crl. Misc. No. M-16680 of 2010 1
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.
Crl. Misc. No. M-16680 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision : 25.8.2010
Mohinder Singh and another
Versus
State of Punjab
...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJAN GUPTA
Present: Mr. L.S. Sidhu, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Shailesh Gupta, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab.
Rajan Gupta, J. (oral)
This is a petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking pre-arrest bail in a case registered against the petitioners under Sections 452, 336, 323, 148 and 149 IPC and Section 25/27 of Arms Act at Police Station Mamdot, District Ferozepur, vide FIR No.9 dated 2nd February, 2010.
Learned State counsel (on instructions from ASI Gurvinder Pal Singh, who is present in Court) submits that pursuant to order dated June 29, 2010, petitioners have joined the investigation and are no longer required for custodial interrogation.
In view of the statement made by learned State counsel, the interim order dated June 29, 2010 is hereby made absolute subject to the conditions as envisaged under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.
The petition stands allowed in aforesaid terms.
(RAJAN GUPTA) JUDGE
25.8.2010 'rajpal'
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the interim interim order dated June 29, 2010 under Section 438 Cr.P.C. granted to the petitioners may be made absolute.
Whether the petitioners need to be produced for custodial interrogation given they have joined the investigation.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Mohinder Singh and another
State of Punjab
Rajan Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court