Partap Chand v. U.T.Chandigarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner filed a petition for regular bail under Section 439 CrPC. The court dismissed this petition as infructuous because the petitioner was acquitted by the trial court.
Petitioner filed a petition for regular bail under Section 439 CrPC. The court dismissed this petition as infructuous because the petitioner was acquitted by the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh
Criminal Misc. No.M- 20070 of 2010 (O&M) Date of decision: 7.9.2010
Partap Chand
......Petitioner
Versus
U.T.Chandigarh
.......Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA
Present: Mr.R.S.Chahal, Advocate for Mr.S.K.Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioner.
SABINA, J.
This petition has been filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regula bail in case FIR No. 131 dated 17.4.2010 under Sections 304-B/ 306/ 498 of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station, Sector 34, Chandigarh.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the present petition has been rendered infructuous as the petitioner has since been acquitted by the trial Court.
Dismissed as having been rendered infructuous.
(SABINA) JUDGE
September 07, 2010
anita
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Partap Chand
U.T. Chandigarh
Sabina
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court