double bed, Diwan, almirah, dressing table etc. Thereafter, on 21.7.2002, A- 1 came from Kaithal to the parents house of the deceased at Jind with a tempo and took away all the aforesaid articles to Kaithal. At that time, A-1 also said that parents of Poonam had given cheaper saries to his mother and sisters in the marriage, therefore, they should also sent Rs. 20,000/- on that account, so that the better saries can be purchased for them. On the said demand, the complainant, his mother Shanti Devi and sister Sushma tried their best to make A-1 understand that on the marriage, they had spent a huge amount and at present, it was not possible for them to pay the said amount and it will be paid later on to him. Thereupon, A-1 threatened that if they did not pay Rs. 20,000/-, then he will not keep their daughter. After two days, the complainant again received telephone call from A-1 with regard to payment of Rs. 20,000/- at the earliest. His sister Poonam also made telephone call to them that her husband (A-1), mother-in-law (A-5), father-in-law (A-4) and brother-in-law (A-2) were harassing her on account of demand of money. On 30.7.2002, the complainant went to the matrimonial home of his sister Poonam and tried his best to make understand the accused that he would send the money after some days. Then all the aforesaid persons said that the complainant should take his sister along with him and as and when he will send the money, his sister can come to the matrimonial home. It is further the case of the prosecution that on the same day, the complainant brought his sister Poonam at Jind. On arrival at their house in Jind, Poonam told him and his mother that A-1 wants to
